Research Newsletter 2005
April - June News
This electronic newsletter is distributed to faculty, postdoctoral
researchers and staff who are interested in current research news
and funding opportunities. Information is compiled by Rosemary Alexander
(rosemary.alexander@case.edu)
and Todd Packer. (todd.packer@case.edu).
Editor: Rosemary Alexander
Sponsored
Projects News
Case News
Research ShowCASE 2005
Approximately 1,800 visitors attended seminars, viewed live demonstrations
and learned about the Case commitment to research at this year's Research
ShowCASE event on April 6 and April 7. Several new and popular features
were introduced this year, including pre-conference seminars, a stage
with brief live demonstrations, multiple formats (including lectures)
for research presentations, and a new floor plan for ease of navigation.
"Research ShowCASE continues to demonstrate the diversity of
top-notch research conducted at Case and our affiliates," indicated
Eric Cottington, Associate VP for Research. "We were pleased
with the expanded participation this year by several schools, including
Arts and Sciences and the Law School, and we look forward to improving
the experience for researchers and attendees for 2006."
In addition to the wide range of symposia, workshops, panel discussions
and lectures, Research ShowCASE 2005 featured presentations by over
550 researchers from Case and its collaborating institutions including
University Hospitals of Cleveland,
the MetroHealth System,
the Louis Stokes Cleveland
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and the Cleveland
Clinic Foundation.
"We are proud that Research ShowCASE highlights the multidisciplinary
learning community at Case," explained Linda Clark, Project Coordinator
for Research ShowCASE, and now the Director for Communication and
Development. "With the valuable feedback provided by participants
as well as the generous support of our sponsors, we will work hard
to ensure that Research ShowCASE continues to highlight the achievements
of our university to our faculty, staff, students and visitors."
As Research ShowCASE only receives external support from the State
of Ohio and private sponsors, the event continues to expand and diversify
as new partners are identified. One component of sponsorship is the
Graduate Student Poster Awards. The 2005 graduate student winners
represent a wide range of schools and departments, including Nursing,
Psychology, Biomedical Engineering and the Weatherhead School of Management.
For a full list of the winners, click
here.
The dates for Research ShowCASE 2006 have been set for April 5-6,
2006. Calls for submissions will be announced in the fall.
To access abstracts from this year's event, please visit the Research
ShowCASE 2005 website at: showcase.case.edu
Principal Investigator/Project Director Policy Statement
In June, OSPA posted the Case Principal Investigator/Project Director
Policy Statement providing guidance regarding who is the individual,
designated by the university, who will assume overall responsibility
for the scientific and/or technical aspects and the day-to-day management
of a project or program, explaining as well that the responsibilities
accompanying that position. Please take the time to review this statement
at http://ora.ra.cwru.edu/ospa/policies/PI_Policy6-1-05.pdf
.
Presidential Research Initiative (PRI) Grant Awards
Congratulations to all seventeen PRI 2005 grant recipients
this year. "We were extremely happy with the diversity and quality
of the proposals the researchers submitted for funding," said
Eric Cottington, associate vice president for research. "The
program is designed to encourage researchers from different disciplines
to collaborate, and it is attaining that goal." This year's winners
representing four schools within the university received a total of
$960,000 in research funding. The list of winners is posted on the
OSPA website at http://ora.ra.cwru.edu/ospa/2005_PRI.pdf
. More details
Gifts vs. Grants - What's the Difference?
Do you understand the difference between a gift and a grant?
The distinction can be very important in the conduct of a award. Posted
on the OSPA website is an explanation of the difference. It is posted
under the FYI section of the OSPA website at http://ora.ra.case.edu/ospa/FYI/
.
OSPA 2004 + 2005 Annual Report / Value of Research publication
The OSPA Annual Report contained in the Value of Research
publication is posted on the OSPA
home page. It is a large pdf file which may take awhile to download
--perhaps best done on campus with a high speed connection.
Independent Contractor Agreements - Important Rules to Note
- If a contractor happens to come to your office to sign an independent
contractor agreement, make sure that the contractor reads the contract
before signing. DOCUMENT that they have read it prior to signing.
- Under NO circumstances is it acceptable to have a contractor sign
an incorrect or incomplete contract and then make substitutions
or changes in the contractor's absence without having the contractor
initial the changes or without clear written permission from the
contractor. Such practices render the terms of such contracts INVALID.
If, in lieu of initially changes, a separate written permission
was obtained from the contractor to change the terms after he/she
signed, such documentation must be stapled to the contract.
- Whiteout must NEVER be used to change the terms of a contract.
Cross out text to be changed and add the correct text in a nearby
space, LEGIBLY, preferably using a typewriter with a line drawn
to clearly indicate the point of insertion of new text.
- Changes to a contract that are not initialed by all parties to
the contract are NOT valid changes. Having a contractor merely sign
the first page of an independent contractor agreement, and then
adding an Exhibit A after-the-fact, renders the whole contract invalid.
Substituting the whole Exhibit A after the contractor signs and
leaves your office, renders the new Exhibit A invalid. UNLESS the
university signatory and the contractor both initial the new Exhibit
A, only the Exhibit A attached at the time the contractor signed
is the valid one. BUT if you have redone the whole Exhibit A, it
is better to just have the contractor sign a new "clean"
contract.
- Each party to a contract is entitled to a contract original. A
contract original is a contract document containing original, i.e.,
not copied, signatures. Hence, you should always make sure that
a contractor signs TWO originals of a contract. The university signatory
will sign both, and one will be sent to the contractor for his/her
files.
New F&A Cost Rate Agreement
Announced previously via oranews:
Case recently executed a new Facilities and Administrative (F&A)
Cost Rate Agreement with the federal government. For the period July
1, 2005 through June 30, 2008, Case’s F&A Cost Rate is 54.5%.
This applies to all federally funded research conducted at Case and
at University Hospitals, the MetroHealth System, and the Cleveland
Clinic Lerner College of Medicine (NIH only). The new off-campus rate
is 26%. The federal fringe benefit rate for the period July 1, 2005
through June 30, 2006 is 25%.
All new proposals submitted to the federal government should use these
new rates. New proposals that have already been submitted (using the
old rate) that are still pending and that have a start date on or
after July 1, 2005 will be awarded at the new F&A Cost Rate. If
the Notice of Grant Award (NGA) issued after July 1, 2005 from the
sponsoring agency does not reflect the new F&A Cost Rate, please
notify your research administration office so that this error can
be communicated to the sponsor and a revised NGA issued.
Non-competing continuation awards for existing grants and contracts
awarded under the old rate will not receive additional funding and
will continue to be awarded under the old F&A cost rate.
Please do not hesitate to contact your school/college research office,
the Office of Sponsored Projects Administration, or the Grants Accounting
Office if you have any questions or concerns.
University Review Form (URF)
Announced previously via oranews:
Please be aware that the University Review Form (URF), which
is used when routing proposals and contracts for department, school/college
and institutional approval, was revised to make it more compatible
with the PeopleSoft Grants Module and to incorporate changes requested
by the various schools and colleges. A fillable pdf version of the
revised University Review Form is downloadable from the OSPA
Forms website. The revised URF is now required for institutional
approval.
University Guidelines on Authorship of Research and Scholarly
Publications
Announced previously via oranews:
The University Guidelines on Authorship of Research and Scholarly
Publications is now posted on the OSPA website under Policies at http://ora.ra.cwru.edu/ospa/policies/index.cfm.
Case Spotlight
 |
Hillel Chiel, Ph.D.
Professor of Biology
Professor of Neurosciences
Professor of Biomedical Engineering |
"...It's no good
to stay at the edge
like a seawall or a mollusk that tries, in its limy way, to look like
a stone.
It's better, pure and easy, to surrender yourself to the delight of
flowing, getting lost, finding yourself in the rhythm of the huge
human heart that beats all around you...."
- from the poem "In The Square" by Vicente Aleixandre
(Original Spanish 1954, translated by Lewis Hyde (1979)
At the juncture of neuroscience, computer science and biomedical
engineering, a primary goal of Professor Hillel Chiel's research is
to understand biological principles fundamental to animal adaptive
behavior, i.e., behavior that allows animals to survive and reproduce.
Professor Chiel's laboratory, supported by the National Science Foundation
and the National Institutes of Health, investigates animal adaptive
behavior through innovative research on the the neural and biomechanical
mechanisms of feeding in the marine mollusk Aplysia californica. Based
on experimental work, Professor Chiel's lab creates computer models
of the neural control and the biomechanics that have been tested through
in vivo and in vitro experiments, as well as through the development
of biologically inspired robots. In addition, in collaboration with
Professors Steven Garverick and Massood Tabib-Azar (Electrical Engineering
and Computer Science) and Professor Heidi Martin (Chemical Engineering),
Professor Chiel's lab has begun to develop novel techniques that make
it possible to wirelessly record and stimulate neurons in intact animals
to identify key neurons that can shape and flexibly alter behavior.
Dr. Chiel’s laboratory focuses on multifunctionality, i.e.,
the ability of the same neural controller and body to generate several
qualitatively different behaviors (just as the human hand can be used
to play piano, throw a ball, unscrew a jaw, or pound a table). His
laboratory has shown that small changes in the activation of neurons,
amplified by the biomechanics, can lead to large qualitative changes
in behavior. These results have led to the design of biologically-inspired
artificial devices with the flexibility of animals. In collaboration
with Professor Roger Quinn, director of the Biorobotics Laboratory,
Professor Randy Beer, electrical engineering and computer science,
and mechanical engineering graduate students Elizabeth Mangan and
Gregory Sutton, two robots have been designed that are based on the
motion of slugs and worms. One device is a novel endoscopic device
that can literally worm itself into complex spaces, like the human
colon. The Olympus Medical Systems group is interested in determining
whether this device, which has recently been patented, can be used
as an assist to existing endoscopes, reducing the risk of damage to
patients as a scope is inserted. The other device, a "gripper,"
based on the function of Aplysia’s feeding apparatus, could
address the need of industry to pick up and delicately handle soft,
irregular objects. An interactive poster describing this work can
be found at www.case.edu/its/itac/poster
.
A 2004 recipient of the Carl
F. Wittke Award for excellence in undergraduate teaching, Professor
Chiel maintains a strong commitment to incorporating his passion for
research in his role as an instructor. Since 1987, when he became a
part of the Biology department's faculty, he has challenged students
to embrace "the excitement of cutting-edge research." An example
of a course assignment from his "Introduction to Neurobiology"
course: Students review a recent paper on neural circuits and neural
systems from a scientific journal and ask three questions:
1) What does the data show?
2) Does the data support the hypothesis?
3) What experiment would you do next?
More information on Professor Chiel's work may be found in the following
articles:
Hillel Chiel
Research Interests
Worms,
slugs inspire robotic devices created by Case biology, engineering
team
Biology
professor helps students develop intellectual tools
back to the top
Federal News
Federal Agency Issues Final Rules for University Investigations
Into Scientific Misconduct
From the daily online Chronicle of Higher Education article by Jeffrey
Brainard, 5/18/2005
"The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services published on
Tuesday the final version of changes to its existing regulations on
how universities investigate and handle cases of alleged research misconduct,
like plagiarism and the fabrication of data....The final rule, published
in the Federal
Register, takes effect June 16. The 32-page document revises rules
imposed in 1989. It also makes the agency's definition of research misconduct
consistent with one adopted by the White House Office of Science and
Technology Policy in 2000 for all federal agencies. ...The final rule
retains the existing regulatory model under which universities must
conduct their own investigations of allegations of research misconduct
involving scientists applying for or receiving the department's research
funds. The agency oversees those inquiries and hears appeals. The National
Institutes of Health, a branch of the department, is the largest single
source of funds for university research.
Among other clarifications and responses to public comments, the
department ruled that:
Universities are not required to establish new programs to train
their employees in the responsible conduct of research. Like the draft
version, however, the final rule requires institutions to foster an
"environment that promotes the responsible conduct of research."
Some people who had commented on the draft criticized the wording
as beyond the rule's appropriate scope.
Institutions must report to the department's Office of Research Integrity
if they settle an accusation of research misconduct before the investigation
concludes. But they are not required to report preliminary investigations,
called inquiries, if they find no research misconduct was committed.
Universities may, but are not required to, give people accused of
research misconduct an opportunity to cross-examine their accusers."
Policy
Implementation of Policy on Enhancing Public Access to Archived
Publications Resulting from NIH-Funded Research
NOT-OD-05-045
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) published its Public Access
Policy (Policy) in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts on February
3, 2005, and in the Federal Register on February 9, 2005. These announcements
and additional relevant information, including Questions and Answers
regarding copyright and other concerns, are available at the NIH
Public Access Web site. The Public Access Policy Authors' Manual
may be viewed at http://www.nih.gov/about/publicaccess/publicaccess_Manual.htm.
The Policy became effective May 2, 2005. The Policy requests and
strongly encourages all NIH-funded investigators to make their peer-reviewed
author's final manuscripts available to other researchers and the
public at the NIH National Library of Medicine's PubMed Central (PMC)
[see www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov]
immediately after the final date of journal publication. At the time
of submission, authors are given the option to release their manuscripts
at a later time, up to 12 months after the official date of final
publication. NIH expects that only in limited cases will authors deem
it necessary to select the longest delay period.
The Policy applies to all research grant and career development award
mechanisms, cooperative agreements, contracts, Institutional and Individual
Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Awards, as well as NIH
intramural research studies. The Policy applies to peer-reviewed,
original research publications that have been supported in whole or
in part with direct costs1 from NIH, but it does not apply to book
chapters, editorials, reviews, or conference proceedings. NIH is requesting
that authors submit publications resulting from 1) currently-funded
NIH research projects or 2) previously-supported NIH research projects
where manuscripts were accepted for publication on or after May 2,
2005. Publications resulting from non-NIH-supported research projects
should not be submitted. NIH welcomes comments and suggestions about
the submission process. Contact NIH by emailing PublicAccess@nih.gov.
More details in the full
announcement.
NIH Notice of Change in Number of Revisions of Small Grant
Applications (R03)
NOT-OD-05-046
With two specific exceptions, noted below, all NIH Institutes and
Centers will accept two revisions of a previously reviewed R03 small
grant application. This includes applications submitted in response
to the general omnibus NIH
Program Announcement PA-03-108, as well as those submitted in
response to Program Announcements issued by one or more Institutes/Centers.
For specific information about the R03 programs click
here.
Investigators are reminded that all small grant applications must
identify a Program Announcement on line 2 of the face page of the
application form PHS 398 (see NOT-OD-05-001).
The two exceptions relate to applications submitted in response to
a Request for Applications (RFA) and to the specialized B/Start programs
of the NIAAA and specialized B/Start and I/Start programs of NIDA.
Read the full
announcement for details.
National Cancer Institute (NCI) Grant Recycling
NCI has instituted a grant
recycling program to redistribute grant workloads over the year.
In recent years, project funding periods have gotten clustered late
in the fiscal year creating unwieldy burdens on NCI staff who administer
these awards. To solve this problem, NCI has decided to recycle them
to other quarters in the year. Competing R01s with project periods
of four or more years and noncompeting R01s with two or more years
remaining will be recycled. Details about the logic and the methodology
may be reviewed by clicking
here.
NSF Revised Grants Policy Manual
National Science Foundation has published a revised version of the
NSF
Grant Policy Manual (GPM) (NSF 05-131), effective July 1, 2005.
This revision implements important changes to NSF's policies and procedures,
as well as implements enhanced capabilities in FastLane. A by chapter
summary of significant changes has been developed to assist the user
in navigating through these changes. At this time, the GPM only is
available in PDF format, but the HTML version will be added to the
NSF website soon. Questions or comments about the GPM should be addressed
to the Policy Office, Division of Institution and Award Support, at
(703) 292-8243 or by e-mail to policy@nsf.gov.
back to the top
NIH
NIH Announces New Closeout Feature in the eRA Commons and
Reminds Grantees of Required Closeout Reports for NIH Assistance Awards
NOT-OD-05-051
The eRA Commons now includes the capability to electronically submit
required Closeout Reports—final progress report, final Financial
Status Report (FSR), and final inventions statement. Commons-registered
grantee institutions may now query in the Commons Status system for
those grants that are in a closeout status. Commons users can then
enter the Closeout screens to electronically process and submit the
required reports. For the final progress report, users will attach
a PDF, Word, or text file. For the Final Financial Status Report users
are directed to the eRA Commons FSR system. For the Final Inventions
Statement users indicate if any Inventions are being reported and
when yes, are provided with text entry areas to report inventions.
Note, a future enhancement of Closeout will include an automatic link
to the IEdison system. Each required report can be submitted independently;
however, grantees are reminded that closeout is not complete until
all reports have been submitted.
NIH recipients shall submit within 90 calendar days after the last
day of the final budget period a Final Financial Status Report, a
Final Progress Report, and a Final Invention Statement and Certification
(as applicable). It is important to note that unless the Grants Management
Officer (GMO) of the respective awarding agency approves an extension
of this 90-day reporting window in writing, grantees must submit the
final reports within the prescribed timeframe.
More details may be found in the announcement.
Reminder: Mandatory use of New Instructions and Forms for
PHS 398 (DHHS Public Health Service Grant Application) and PHS 2590(DHHS
Public Health Service Non-Competing Grant Progress Report)
NOT-OD-05-043
Use of the revised instructions and forms (9/04) for the PHS 398
and PHS 2590 are mandatory for receipt/submission on or after the
following dates:
May 10, 2005 for the PHS 398
May 1, 2005 for the PHS 2590
back to the top
NSF
NSF Announces Intent to Establish Two New Science and Technology
Centers
The National Science Foundation (NSF) has announced it intends to
establish two new Science and Technology Centers (STCs) in fiscal
2005. One is a major collaborative cybersecurity project led by the
University of California, Berkeley, and a second, centered at the
University of Kansas, will study how the balance of mass in the polar
ice sheets may affect sea level. Click
here for the full announcement.
back to the top
Miscellany
Useful Website
Planning international travel, phone conferences, meetings?
Figure out what time it is anywhere in the world with The Time Zone
Converter.
www.timezoneconverter.com/
back to the top
Compliance
News
Special Protections for Children as Research Subjects
Children Involved as Subjects in Research: Guidance on the HHS 45
CFR 46.407 ("407") Review Process
Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP)
This document provides guidance on the HHS 45 CFR 46.407 review process
("407 review process") as required under subpart D of HHS
Protection of Human Subjects Regulations at 45 CFR part 46.In particular,
the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) offers guidance on
the following topics:
(1) IRB findings necessary to submit a protocol to OHRP for 407 consideration
and/or review;
(2) steps in the submission process;
(3) OHRP's response to submissions;
(4) the schedule and details for 407 panel review; and
(5) potential outcomes of the 407 review process.
This guidance applies to HHS- conducted or -supported research.
Click
here to read the full announcement.
ORI Publishes Final Misconduct Rule
The Office of Research Integrity in the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) has published its final rule on Public Health Service
Policies on Research Misconduct in the Federal Register on May 17.
The final rule implements the standard federal policies and procedures
on research misconduct issued by the Office of Science and Technology
Policy on December 6, 2000. It adopts the federal-wide definition
of misconduct as "fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism,"
eliminating some vagueness in prior attempts at rulemaking. It also
establishes a uniform process that will be used to address misconduct.
The rule goes into effect on June 15.
To review the ORI rule, visit:
http://ori.hhs.gov/documents/FR_Doc_05-9643.shtml
Research Equipment
Resources
Equipment
to Borrow or Lend?
Do you need some equipment but do not have the funds to purchase it?
Do you have equipment you are not using and would be willing to lend
to other researchers at CWRU? This spot in the newsletter will be
devoted to those needs. Send notices of equipment you are willing
to lend or need to borrow to Rosemary Alexander at rosemary.alexander@case.edu.
Equipment Broken or Working Poorly?
The Scientific Instrument Repair Center (SIRC), directed by William
M. Frank, services a wide variety of research equipment from small
bench top equipment to X-ray generators for any laboratory on campus
at reduced cost. The SIRC also offers advice when purchasing new equipment
and extended warranties. The Center is located on the CWRU campus
in the School of Medicine in TB07. Contact Mr. Frank at 368-3225 or
william.frank@case.edu
for details about fees and services or go to http://mediswww.cwru.edu/sirc/.
If you need to borrow equipment while yours is being serviced,
you are welcome to post a notice in this space. Email Rosemary
Alexander with your notice.
Need Specialized Equipment Built?
The Design and Fabrication Center (DFC), located on campus in the
School of Medicine in EG-1, is a fully equipped machine shop, and
will custom build new equipment or modify existing equipment to meet
your needs at reduced cost. The DFC can provide technical and engineering
support service for any mechanical, electrical, and computerized application,
for significantly less money. The DFC provides services not only to
any CWRU lab, but also to University Hospitals, Cleveland Clinic,
and CWRU-affiliated biomedical companies. Contact Mr. Torontali at
368-3461 or steven.torontali@case.edu.
The DFC website, currently under construction, will be available at
http://mediswww.cwru.edu/DFC/.
back to the top
Funding Opportunities

OSPA Funding News
The Office of Sponsored Projects Administration (OSPA) maintains
a funding page at the this link (http://ora.ra.cwru.edu/OSPA/News/Funding_news.cfm).
This list of funding announcements is not meant to be comprehensive.
It changes at least monthly, sometimes daily. Announcements will be
displayed on the website until the letter of intent due date or the
application due date and will not be archived, so be sure to save
any announcements to which you wish to refer in a future month. The
list may include internal funding opportunities as they arise, as
well as some less publicized and/or cross-discipline funding announcements
sent to us by various routes. OSPA assumes that the reader is also
making use of Community of Science (see below), to which the university
subscribes, as well as the other resources listed in the links which
follow these announcements. If you know of funding announcements that
you think should be posted on this page, please contact Rosemary Alexander
at rosemary.alexander@case.edu.
Community of Science (COS)
Case is a subscriber to Community of
Science (COS), which makes it possible for you as faculty or research
staff to make use of this excellent service. If you have not already
set up your own profile in Community of Science and need help in doing
so, please do not hesitate to call OSPA for guidance (368-4510). You
may also contact the Case campus COS liaisons, Monica Bradley (368-4432
or monica.bradley@case.edu)
or Narinder Dhaliwal (368-2001 or narinder.dhaliwal@case.edu)
for help.
School
of Medicine Funding Alerts
While many of you may already receive hard copies of the School of
Medicine Funding Alert, the School of Medicine's quarterly newsletter
listing funding opportunities and grant-writing tips, you may not
be aware that the Funding Alert is also available, in its entirety,
online in PDF format. A comprehensive list of RFP's available for
the current period, may be viewed at http://mediswww.cwru.edu/researchoffice/index.html.
At this URL, click on "Funding Opportunities". Then choose the current
School of Medicine Funding Alert. Contact Narinder Dhaliwal in the
School of Medicine at 368-2001 or narinder.dhaliwal@case.edu
if you have questions.
Links to Sponsors
For an ever-growing list of links to many sources of funding announcements,
both public and private, to aid your searches, click on the OSPA Links
page.
back to the top
Conferences &
Symposiums

The OSPA listing of conferences
and symposiums is updated at least monthly, but often more frequently
throughout the month. If you have announcements you would like posted,
please email them to Rosemary
Alexander. Please click
here to go to the Conferences page now. back
to the top
Re. Printing this newsletter:
If printing the newsletter is important and you wish to capture all
of the right margin text, you should print in landscape mode in Internet
Explorer. Netscape Navigator has a "Shrink to Fit" option
to check under "Page Setup" in the drop down File menu, which
will allow you to print the full width of the page in portrait mode.
If you wish to save this newsletter as a pdf file, you may do so
on PCs via Adobe Acrobat (the full version), which is downloadable
for free to faculty, staff, and students from the Case
Software Center. In Adobe Acrobat, choose "Open Web Page"
from the "File" menu, then insert the URL and click "Download".
Adobe Acrobat may display an error message re. one gif file which
may not load correctly. Just ignore this, it does not affect the appearance
of the newsletter. Mac users using the Safari browser, may choose
to print to pdf. Internet Explorer also will print to pdf, but truncates
the right portion of the page in doing so.
back to the top
To unsubscribe:
If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, please contact Rosemary
Alexander at rosemary.alexander@case.edu.
If you are aware of individuals who are not currently on our mailing
list and would like to receive the newsletter, please have them email
Rosemary Alexander. |